Argument Order Alternations in Dutch
نویسندگان
چکیده
We investigate the factors that influence argument order variations in Dutch, focusing on ditransitive verbs. Evidence from grammaticality judgments is complemented with evidence from the distributions of the alternants in corpora of spoken and written Dutch. We find that while the NP/PP alternation is influenced by weight, the direct object shift (DOS) in the dative alternation is bound to certain types of pronouns. Additional evidence for our account for the DOS is found in the Dutch AcI construction. Our findings are modeled within the framework of Optimality Theoretic syntax, allowing for violable and ranked constraints, as well as a stochastic interpretation of the analysis.
منابع مشابه
Dutch and German 3-Year-Olds' Representations of Voicing Alternations.
The voicing contrast is neutralized syllable and word finally in Dutch and German, leading to alternations within the morphological paradigm (e.g., Dutch 'bed(s)', be[t]-be[d]en, German 'dog(s)', Hun[t]-Hun[d]e). Despite structural similarity, language-specific morphological, phonological and lexical properties impact on the distribution of this alternation in the two languages. Previous acquis...
متن کاملThe Roles of Phonotactics and Frequency in the Learning of Alternations
Several recent studies have examined the acquisition of morphophonological alternations, with apparently conflicting findings. Production and comprehension studies with both real and nonce words suggest that 31⁄2 year old Dutch-learning children do not yet have productive knowledge of the morphophonological voicing alternation (Zamuner, Kerkhoff, Fikkert, and Westrek 2005; Zamuner, Kerkhoff, an...
متن کاملArgument/oblique Alternations and the Structure of Lexical Meaning a Dissertation Submitted to the Department of Linguistics and the Committee on Graduate Studies of Stanford University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
This dissertation examines the semantic underpinnings of argument realization. Much recent work in argument realization is based on some notion of “prominence preservation,” wherein the morphosyntactic prominence of an argument in the clause (e.g. its grammatical relation) supposedly reflects its prominence in the meaning of the clause. I explore prominence preservation as it applies to crossli...
متن کاملGerlof Bouma and Jonas Kuhn: On the split nature of the Dutch laten-causative
We present a discussion of the laten-perception-causative construction in Dutch, formed by combining laten ‘let’ and a non-volitional perception/cognition verb like zien ‘see’. On the basis of partly novel argument alternation and binding data, we show that these causatives cannot be captured by a standard raising analysis. This sets these data apart from other uses of causative laten. The late...
متن کاملSemantics and Pragmatics of Argument Alternations
After setting out the challenges posed by argument alternations for linguistic theory, this paper reviews the development of accounts of argument alternations over the last fifty years, documenting a shift from accounts that are primarily syntactic in nature to accounts with semantic and pragmatic components. The remainder of the paper consists of case studies of the developing understanding of...
متن کامل